Skip to main content

Stock Price and Fundamentals

Jim Cramer:
Even at the height of my firm, Cramer Berkowirtz, I managed only about $450 million for a bunch of wealthy families, a pittance compared to the major mutual funds arid some large hedge funds that control the marginal dollar that determines stock prices at the end of' the day. I mention this to drill into your head the importance considering supply and demand of the stock at all times. That's because way too many people get confused; they think we are trading the actual companies themselves, that the pieces of paper we are trading, investing, owning, are sort of redemptive right, a coupon that will give you certain cents off, or an ownership right that will allow You to have a chunk of the brick and. mortar if not the cash in the treasury of' the joint, Untrue. These are, in the end, simply pieces of paper, to be bought, sold, or manipulated up and down by those with more capital than others. All other investment books stress the linkage between the stock and the company. Me? I stress the abject lack of short-term linkage and the opportunities that such an unconnectedness presents. While it is true that over the very, very long term-say your lifetime-stocks should indeed reflect the fundamentals, over the short term, the twelve- to eighteen-month time frame that is most applicable to most owners these days like it or not that's how long most stocks are held-the fundamentals of the company play only a part in what moves a stock up or down. In fact, I believe the reason that so many professional managers and amateurs fail to beat the market or make big money is that: they are way too hung up on the largely artificial linkage, short-term, between a company's health and the health of the stock. I think that deep down they like the linkage because it makes them feel that they aren't gambling with their money (or their clients' money). They think that if they stay focused on the fundamentals they have turned gambling into investing. I wish I could be so glib. I wish I could focus only on the company arid not the stock, because it would be much easier. But it would also be much less lucrative.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Spanish Debt Issues

There is a lot of talk about Spanish sovereign debts recently. I came across a research paper which I think is very useful for me and wish to share it here. This is taken from www.fundsupermart.com, an online fund broker where you can purchase funds form various fund managers. This portal provides some research and comparisons and it is essentially a self service portal. From the chart provided, we can see that there is a problem for Spain to service their debts for the next 4-5 years if the debts are not re-structured. With this kind of risk, no sane investors would want to risk their money to buy Spanish bonds. They can only turn to European central bank for bail out. The blue arrow is a fictitious line I draw assuming re-structuring is going to happen. Essentially, they have to move the payment of capitals into next 5-20 years to be affordable. In addition to that, they can't make additional loans. This is just taking a very simplistic view of the situation. To have that hap...

Stock Price Trend - Continuation Pattern

Here is the truth about stock price trends: it tends to follow something called continuation pattern. Price trends once established, will tend to continue in it direction. This is similar to the law of physics. Taking at look at the current market, you will notice that indexes like the S&P 500, Dow Jone or Nasdaq Composite are in down trends. Depending on the type of investor or trader you are, you many want to remember this law by heart and constantly reminding yourself about this law. Some people don't like to use the terms bull market or bear market because they think that they are versatile traders and they can make money in either up trend or down trend. For, me, there is no harm in using any terms you want to describe the market as long as you have great discipline in your investing or trading strategies. I tend to use the words investing and trading interchangeably because in both cases, they are all about speculation. The difference is probably in the time horizon that ...

Professional Investor's advice, market hype etc.

This is an article that I read on 26th September 2012. It has been over a year now and I suddenly remembered. I'd posted this last year with some other predictions from CNBC etc. During then, I was very fascinated listening to these experts. They are so confident and so logical. I always admire their ability to "read" the market and manage hundreds of millions of dollars of other people's money. So of them managed billions of dollars. Then I thought what if they ever go wrong? Won't they lose a lot of money? So, I think it would have been interesting to remember what they said and then we verify later. On 26th September, the S&P 500 index closed at 1433.32. One year went on and it went up another 19% from there. Below is S&P 500 over last one and a half year. As we can see, the market has still been a bull. Over the one year period, the S&P 500 index did correct itself. However, it was a